Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Yards, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Velez Garcia-Nieto A, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) Ponta delgada bride between your past lookup big date while the complete book big date. Using this guidance, magazines should consider asking for article authors off SRs so you’re able to upgrade the books lookup before acceptance of one’s SRs. SR pages should also determine enough time slowdown between the past browse day of the evaluations to ensure the evidence is up-to-go out to own active systematic decision-and come up with.
References
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Health-related analysis in the medical care a practical book. In the. Cambridge: Cambridge University Push,; 2001: step 1 online financial support (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Part 24: playing with medical feedback and records away from lingering trials getting medical and you will ethical trial structure, monitoring, and reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Medical recommendations from inside the health care : meta-study from inside the context. next ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper New jersey, Jones DR. Proof synthesis because key to more defined and you may successful browse. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is actually logical evaluations upwards-to-day during the time of publication? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty-six.
Palese An excellent, Coletti S, Dante An excellent. Guide results one of several highest impact grounds nursing journals last year: a good retrospective investigation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Almost all systematic studies composed for the higher-feeling guides failed to register the fresh new standards: an effective meta-epidemiological studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H. The methodological top-notch logical product reviews had written from inside the highest-impact breastfeeding magazines: a glance at the fresh new books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Practise units in proof oriented practice: testing regarding recyclable learning items (RLOs) to have learning about meta-research. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Blowjob, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR try a reputable and valid dimension product to evaluate the fresh methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Yards, Vallve Odena Meters, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A, Jeric Meters, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Yards, Poklepovic Pericic T, ainsi que al. Methodological and you may reporting quality of systematic recommendations had written about large ranking publications in the area of serious pain. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The grade of clinical feedback at your fingertips functions: a diagnosis playing with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Virtual assistant, Sharif MO. A keen AMSTAR assessment of your methodological top-notch clinical ratings regarding dental health care interventions published on journal off applied oral science (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):440seven.
Systematic reviews and you may meta-analyses toward psoriasis: part from capital sources, dispute of great interest and you can bibliometric indicator as the predictors regarding methodological high quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163349.
Brandt JS, Downing Air conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Pass classics within the obstetrics and you can gynecology: brand new 100 normally quoted diary posts during the last 50 ages. In the morning J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1seven.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Yards, Tam WW, Tang J. Distribution and epidemiological functions regarding composed private diligent study meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Affirmation away from PRISMA report and you will top-notch systematic ratings and meta-analyses had written inside the nursing publications: a corner-sectional investigation. BMJ Unlock. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Bj, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Yards, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai Good, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Additional validation out-of a description product to evaluate systematic feedback (AMSTAR). PLoS That. 2007;2(12):e1350.